Security for Costs of Appeal: Draft & Format
Reference draft used in Indian courts — replace the blanks with your own case details.
(Form No. 4, Appendix G, CPC)
In the Court of .................
Appeal No . ……..of……..
A Appellant
versus
B Respondent
This security bond for costs on appeal executed by .....................
WITNESSETH: The appellant has preferred an appeal from the decree in suit No. ......... of 20 ……..against the respondent, and has been called upon to furnish security. Accordingly, I, of my own free will stand surety for the costs of the appeal, mortgaging the properties specified in the Schedule hereto annexed. I shall not transfer the said properties or any part thereof, and in the event of any default on the part of the appellant, I shall duly carry out any order that may be made against me with regard to payment of the costs of appeal. Any amount so payable shall be realised from the properties hereby mortgaged and if the proceeds of the sale of the said properties are insufficient to pay amount due, I and my legal representatives will be personally liable to pay the balance. To this effect I execute this security bond this day of 20
WITNESSES Schedule
1 . ...........................Signed
2.
Using this format
This is a reference draft reproduced for study and adaptation. Court rules, court fees and the correct forum vary with the facts and the value of the claim, so have the document checked and filed by an advocate. A defective application can be returned or dismissed even when the case itself is good.
Our Civil Litigation team drafts and files these documents before the Calcutta High Court, city civil courts, magistrate, family and consumer courts in Kolkata. Our civil litigation team drafts, files and argues these applications in Kolkata courts.
Related
- Civil Litigation services in Kolkata
- Filing in the Calcutta High Court: complete guide
- All sample legal formats
- All 47 practice areas
- Free first consultation
Disclaimer: this page is a sample format reproduced for reference and study. It is not legal advice and does not create an advocate–client relationship.