Application for Availability of Name for the Company
Reference draft used in Indian courts — replace the blanks with your own case details.
The Registrar of Companies,
Sir,
Sub: Availability of Names - Information - Furnishing of
We, the following applicants, are desirous of forming a company to be registered under the Companies
Act, 1956 in the State of .......................................
1. Name and full address of the person(s)
applying for the availability of the name
(In Block Capitals) :
2. Proposed name of the Company :
3. State whether public or private :
4. In case the proposed name mentioned in
item (2) is not available, 3 names to be
considered in the order of preference :
5. Main object of the proposed Company :
6. Names and address of the prospective
Directors or Promoters, etc. :
7. Particulars of the names and situation of
registered offices of other Companies in the
same group or under the same management:
8. Proposed authorised capital :
9. Please furnish particulars and results of any
application moved to this or any other
Registrar previously for availability of name:
10. Particulars of remittance of fee
(Draft/IPO) :
Situation:
Dated:
Signature of Applicant
Using this format
This is a reference draft reproduced for study and adaptation. Court rules, court fees and the correct forum vary with the facts and the value of the claim, so have the document checked and filed by an advocate. A defective application can be returned or dismissed even when the case itself is good.
Our Corporate & Company Law team drafts and files these documents before the Calcutta High Court, city civil courts, magistrate, family and consumer courts in Kolkata. Our corporate team handles company formation, filings and commercial contracts.
Related
- Corporate & Company Law services in Kolkata
- Filing in the Calcutta High Court: complete guide
- All sample legal formats
- All 47 practice areas
- Free first consultation
Disclaimer: this page is a sample format reproduced for reference and study. It is not legal advice and does not create an advocate–client relationship.