Application under Rule 159 of the Rajasthan High: Format
Reference draft used in Indian courts — replace the blanks with your own case details.
.................................................. Versus.....................................
May it please your Lordships
Your Lordships humble applicant wants to enter into caveat under R. 159 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules and let nothing be done till the applicants are heard in the matter. The particulars of the appeal/revision which is likely to be filed are given below:
The appeal may be filed by any of the following persons:
1. ....................
2. ....................
3. ....................
That the appeal is likely to be filed against:
1. ....................
2. ....................
3. ....................
That the judgment against which the Revision/Appeal is to be filed is from the Court of.................... dated....................
That the Appeal/Revision which is to be filed will be....................
That Vakalatnama on behalf of Shri.................... is submitted herewith.
It is, therefore, humbly prayed that nothing be done in the case till the applicants are heard.
It is accordingly prayed.
Petitioner
Through Advocate
Place:....................
Dated:....................
Using this format
This is a reference draft reproduced for study and adaptation. Court rules, court fees and the correct forum vary with the facts and the value of the claim, so have the document checked and filed by an advocate. A defective application can be returned or dismissed even when the case itself is good.
Our Civil Litigation team drafts and files these documents before the Calcutta High Court, city civil courts, magistrate, family and consumer courts in Kolkata. Our civil litigation team drafts, files and argues these applications in Kolkata courts.
Related
- Civil Litigation services in Kolkata
- Filing in the Calcutta High Court: complete guide
- All sample legal formats
- All 47 practice areas
- Free first consultation
Disclaimer: this page is a sample format reproduced for reference and study. It is not legal advice and does not create an advocate–client relationship.