When a civil suit is filed against you, Order VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 gives the defendant a fixed window to file the written statement: thirty days from the date the summons is served, extendable by the court for recorded reasons up to an outer limit of ninety days from that date. Miss it and the court may hear the suit without your defence and pass an ex parte decree. The written statement is your defence; a set-off or counter-claim is your own claim, raised in the same document.
When this matters
This matters the moment a summons in a civil suit is served on a defendant, whether an individual, a firm or a company. The clock starts from the date of service, not the date you engage a lawyer or gather your papers, and not the date of the first hearing. If you are served and take no step, the plaintiff can ask the court to proceed ex parte under Order IX Rule 6. If you are the plaintiff, the defendant's default is what puts you in a position to press for judgment.
Because the deadline is short, a defendant should consult a civil litigation lawyer as soon as the summons arrives, and the civil litigation formats page carries the standard drafts. You can also reach us through our contact page.
The defendant's timeline under Order VIII
- Thirty days from service of summons to present the written statement, under Order VIII Rule 1.
- Extension only within a ceiling. The proviso lets the court allow a later date for reasons recorded in writing and on such costs as it thinks fit, but not later than ninety days from the date of service of summons. The outer limit is statutory and cannot be extended by consent.
- Specific denials. Order VIII Rule 3 requires every allegation of fact to be dealt with specifically; a general or evasive denial is not enough. Under Order VIII Rule 4, a matter of fact that should be raised by way of set-off and is not raised is treated as admitted.
- New facts relied on by the defendant must be pleaded, under Order VIII Rule 2, because a defence not pleaded is ordinarily not open at trial.
Seeking an extension
How it is done: an application supported by an affidavit, filed before the suit is called for hearing on the day fixed, asking for further time and explaining the delay with dates. What the court looks at: whether there are reasons fit to be recorded in writing, whether the delay is explained and not merely asserted, the stage of the suit, the conduct of the defendant, and any prejudice to the plaintiff. Costs are commonly imposed as the price of the indulgence. Practically, file the application before the thirty days expire; an application made after the court has already proceeded ex parte is a different remedy, dealt with under Order IX Rule 13.
Written statement, reply, set-off and counter-claim
- Written statement: the defendant's answer to the plaint, pleading his defence to each material allegation.
- Reply: a pleading that answers a counter-claim; the plaintiff answers the counter-claim as though he were a defendant. Do not confuse it with the written statement, which is the defendant's first pleading; a "reply" will not do the work of a defence.
- Set-off (Order VIII Rule 6): where the defendant claims to set off an ascertained sum of money legally recoverable by him against the plaintiff's demand, and both parties fill the same character, the written statement must contain the particulars, and the set-off operates like a cross-suit.
- Counter-claim (Order VIII Rule 6A): any right or claim in respect of a cause of action accruing to the defendant against the plaintiff, raised before the defendant delivers his defence or before the time for delivering it has expired. A counter-claim is treated as a plaint, and the plaintiff answers it.
Consequences of not filing within the time allowed
Order VIII Rule 10 provides that where a party fails to present a written statement called for by the court, the court may pronounce judgment against the defendant or make such order in relation to the suit as it thinks fit. Order IX Rule 6 provides that where the defendant does not appear and service is proved, the court may proceed ex parte. The result is the risk of an ex parte decree, executable like any other decree and set aside only on an application under Order IX Rule 13 or on appeal. The defence you did not file is usually lost.
Common mistakes
- Treating the thirty days as running from the date you instructed a lawyer rather than the date of service.
- Filing a bare denial. Order VIII Rule 3 requires a specific answer to each allegation.
- Raising a set-off or counter-claim later instead of in the written statement, when Rule 6A expects it before the defence is delivered.
- Ignoring the summons and later claiming you did not know of the suit; the court goes by the record of service.
- Assuming the ninety days is a fresh period after the first thirty. It is the outer limit measured from service of summons.
Common questions
Can the court extend time beyond ninety days?
No. The proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 places the outer limit at ninety days from the date of service of summons. Within that period the court has discretion, exercised for recorded reasons and usually on costs, but beyond it the written statement cannot be taken on the record as of right. Thereafter the route is to set aside an ex parte decree, not to seek more time.
What is the difference between a written statement and a reply?
The written statement is the defendant's defence to the plaint. A reply is a subsequent pleading, typically the plaintiff's answer to a counter-claim, or a rejoinder where the court permits one. The two are not interchangeable.
Can I file a counter-claim after the written statement?
Order VIII Rule 6A expects a counter-claim before the defendant delivers his defence or before the time for delivering it has expired. A late counter-claim is not a matter of right; the court may refuse it, and the defendant may then have to sue separately.
If I fail to file, is my case over?
Not necessarily, but the position is serious. The court may pronounce judgment against you under Order VIII Rule 10, or proceed ex parte under Order IX Rule 6. If a decree follows, you must apply under Order IX Rule 13 to set it aside, or appeal, and you will have to explain the default as a sufficient cause.
FileX Advocates & Legal Consultants, Kolkata, drafts and files these matters before the Calcutta High Court, City Civil and Sessions courts, magistrate, family, consumer and tribunal forums. Call +91 7439811422 or WhatsApp us for a free first consultation.